Jan 062011

Arsenal o Man City 0

There is having a penchant for defensive midfielders, there is playing cautiously and hitting teams on the break, and then there the sort of display City put in last night. Dour, dull but effective, it was the single most negative performance I’ve seen in many years, from an expensively assembled side with plenty of available attacking talent (ignore the absences of Silva and Balotelli, when you spend hundreds of millions on ready made players and leave the likes of Adam Johnson out, you cannot complain about a couple of injuries).

The approach is entirely understandable if you’re travelling to a powerhouse who have been impenetrable at their home ground. But everyone knows what is possible if you attack us, more than one team has shown that this season, but it was almost as if City were scared of opening up, scared of even trying to win. Make no mistake, this wasn’t a tactic of sit and then counter, this was a team not making any effort to win the match. Very strange.

There are those who will compliment them for it, and I certainly agree that they defended well, particularly in the second half. But while you can point to the result as evidence that the tactic worked, it was more down to fortune than anything else. As Wenger rightly pointed out afterwards, we still created more chances than you are usually afforded in these games, and the only reason we went away without the three points was bad luck. Van Persie and Cesc both had terrific efforts rebound off the post, had either of those gone in we could and should have gone on to get rewarded for what was a very decent performance, and City’s negative tactics would’ve looked ridiculous. Fine lines.

But, at the end of the day, they didn’t go in, and that’s football. Joe Hart also made a couple of good saves, although I thought Sky’s fawning over him was excessive given how both efforts that struck the post saw him comfortably beaten at his near post. But once our initial onslaught had failed to produce the goal it deserved, City settled, and it became increasingly difficult to break them down. We grew more frustrated as the game went ibm culminating in a silly incident when Sagna pushed his head into Zabaleta after a nothing challenge. I have no complaints over Sagna’s red card – while it could hardly be called violent conduct it is something you get sent off for these days, but Zabaleta did nothing, and were we City fans we’d be fuming at that one.

It ended up being a brilliant night for United – Chelsea lost, Spurs lost and we and City took points off each other – they couldn’t have written the script better. And as Chelsea continue to implode, United do indeed find themselves in a very strong position. On the plus side, they probably look down the table and see us as their major rivals now, unless they consider City a credible threat.

On this performance, I wouldn’t pay City that compliment. Draws kill championship challenges – consider that United are unbeaten, and we’ve lost five games, yet they are only four points ahead of us. Managers are beginning to understand that given a pair of draws, if you can throw men forward and turn one of them into a win, it more than makes up for that tactic backfiring on the other occasion. Catenaccio doesn’t win titles, and in Mancini continues to deploy three defensive midfielders, City will drop too many points to truly challenge.

I don’t think Mancini is stupid, I think he realises that his side aren’t yet equipped for a title tilt – that will undoubtedly come in time. For now, he’d accept a top four finish, an ever increasing possibility given the plights of two of the traditional Big Four. Draws like the one City have just managed will help them.

As for us, we shouldn’t be too downhearted. Two wins and two draws from a set of tricky matches over Christmas is a good return, and we’ve got a load of very winnable matches coming up. United will drop points – if we can continue to play as we currently are, we have every chance.

  12 Responses to “The extent of City’s ambition is laid bare at the Emirates”

  1. I have to seriously ask again.

    What is the Aspirations of Arsene, Arsenal and Arsenal fans this season?

    Is it just winning the Carling Cup and beating the BIG four?

    If those are the only GOALS, we are well on our way.

    If not, then we are fast running out of time to prune and make a few vital additions. Quickly reset our boundaries and aim higher. Failure in taking action now, will confirm to the Bear Arsenal is behaving like a small fish in a BIG pond. At least no one would dare say, we are not a fish!

    • For your own sake, I hope the stupidity evident in this comment of yours is the product of some heavy drinking.

      Arsenal have just played very well in a tough game against opponents who did not bother to even pretend they were interested in scoring, and were unfortunate to get only a draw, and your response is to question the ambition of “Arsenal fans”?

      Clearly then, you’re not an Arsenal fan. So why don’t you sod off to the Spuds blog you belong to?

    • No, that makes absolutely no sense. City defended extremely well, but at the same time we did manage to break them down on a number of occasions, and were denied only by bad luck (striking the post twice).

      I think we’re aiming pretty high.

    • I can’t believe this comment. Are you out of ur mind? We were playing against a starting XI worth 170 million pounds! It should show u that it isn’t just about buying players. Arsenal played very well and were very unlucky to come out with just one point. They did very very well yesterday night. Man city came to the emirates, yet again, for a goaless draw.

  2. I feel after the knock that Nasri took early in the first half had an impact on his overall game and in Arsene’s words he played with the handbrake on. I’m sure that we’d be in with a good shout for the title as united cannot go on winning whilst playing poorly for the rest of the term

  3. Man. City was plain and simple rubbish and negative in typical Italian style ,defend for all you,re worth and try and score on the counter attack,what counter attack as Song and Wilshere were dynamic in Arsenal,s midfield and Djourou with Koscielny had a rather easy evening against an impotent City attack ?

  4. MC are doing exactly what Chelsea and the red faced did. Play on the counter. Wenger was lucky Tevex shot did not result in a goal.
    I’m afraid if the gunners are confronted by anti soccer teams, they fizzle out of ideas. It seems there is no variation and only one way of playing. That is not the hallmrk of ateam with title aspirations.

    • We were lucky Tevez didn’t score? He was a lot further away than our efforts that hit the post.

      So United are potential champions? City did the same to them…

    • Jeremy Goldsmith, for many other games your comment would make sense, but Citeh only had one chance in the whole game and didn’t play on the counter. ‘Play on the counter’ needs midfield to break as well, but they didn’t. The one chance they had wasn’t a great opportunity but as tevez didn’t have any support, he had to take a chance.

  5. I loved as much as you’ll receive carried out right here. The sketch is tasteful, your authored subject matter stylish. nonetheless, you command get got an shakiness over that you wish be delivering the following. unwell unquestionably come more formerly again as exactly the same nearly very often inside case you shield this hike.

  6. In search of checking for a short time for a reasonable content articles focused on this unique point . Scouting in Search engines I ultimately picked up this great site. Looking at this info I’m just thrilled to say that I have a positive impression I stubled onto everything that I needed. I most certainly will make sure to don’t forget this blog and check it out on a constant basis.

  7. It’s really a great and helpful piece of info. I am glad that you shared this useful information with us. Please keep us informed like this. Thanks for sharing.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.