July has arrived, Wimbledon has ended and the rain is pouring down outside – it must be time to return to the football. Of course if I were only to talk about what was actually happening then this might be a somewhat short blog, instead I find myself compelled to encourage you to never, ever, under any circumstances, buy the Sun again.

Okay?

They really are a tiresome lot. It is one thing to make up outlandish rumours – they do that every summer, and aren’t even necessarily the worst offenders, but to revisit the same old tired nonsense over and over is just downright pathetic. Cesc has come out numerous times to say, unequivocally, that he will not be leaving Arsenal this summer, countering every ‘story’ the day after it breaks, but still they persist.

Today, apparently, we’ve placed a £40m price tag on his head (the image of that is amusing in itself, by the same token Adebayor must be doing the bleep test with a green ‘Star Buy’ sticker on prominent display). The quote looks fairly convincing, until you realise that it came from ‘A Gunners insider’. More reliable than ‘a source close the the player’, but one step down from a columnist’s ‘understanding’, this is yet more evidence of a slow summer at the Emirates, with the papers desperate to fill pages previously reserved for a summer-long Ronaldo saga.

Even the reasoning is laughable – apparently the sale is to provide Wenger with the funds to make a challenge for the Premiership this season, as if selling your best player and replacing him with those that take a while to settle in immediately improves the side. Ah yes, Sun logic, the greatest oxymoron of them all.

But so far, nothing out of the ordinary – we’re used to seeing this level of garbage, and we’re also used to the depressing tidal wave of repeat stories on Newsnow, as the internet goes wild with panic and anger. What is slightly different this time is how the Telegraph have done what so many blogs do, and that is simply reprint the story despite its obvious absence of reality.

The Telegraph is a weird beast. Portraying itself as a respectable paper, it does deliver it certain aspects – its cricket coverage, for example, is actually very insightful – but when it comes to football rumours it is nothing more than the worst kind of tabloid masquerading as a broadsheet, willing to plumb the depths of its long lost cousins to bring in the readers desperate for a dose of transfer excitement.

On to brighter things, and the one transfer story that does appear to have legs, that of Brazilian Felipe Melo. The story seemed to be over when Melo signed an extension last week, but it seems that was an automatic clause the club simply invoked, according to the player:

“I have a contract with Fiorentina in which it was written that should I have a good first season, the club would have the possibility to extend my contract automatically from five to six years.”

Fair enough, and with that extension comes a buyout clause of €25m, roughly £21m in our money, and excitement flew around the Arsenal wires with the news that we had indeed placed a bid, with Fiorentina willing to reduce the price if Eboue was included in the deal, as stated on the Italian’s website:

“Fiorentina in turn proposed to the aforementioned club [Arsenal] a reduction in the amount set by the release clause by including right-back (Emmanuel) Eboue in the deal.”

It might just be me, but I smell something a bit iffy about all of this. We may have placed a bid, but in reality Wenger is unlikely to shell out that sort of cash on anyone, and given the past tense of Fiorentina’s statement, it seems like this deal is already dead in the water – we offered, they counter offered, and there was no meeting in the middle. Given our stance of silence in these matters, it wouldn’t surprise me if this were old news, both clubs having already moved on.

Still, we can but hope, it certainly is better than reading about Cesc’s imminent departure every week in the gutter press.

 

The state of the media in this country is downright depressing at times, especially in these lean summer months where sport sections cannot be shortened, and pages must be filled with a story designed to catch the eye of the reader.

And the one-upmanship going on is ridiculous – frankly, anyone who falls for it and buys the paper in question is a fool. Arsenal to bid for Benzema? Oh yeah, we’re sure to outbid the likes of United for a £30m striker. Okay, well how about £30m plus Bendtner for Ribery? I hope the editor cries himself to sleep at night.

Unfortunately, we live in the Sun generation, a world where the vast majority seem to believe everything they read in ‘the nation’s favourite red top’ (or more accurately, as beautifully described by Tim on 7amkickoff, ‘an open sore on the anus of society’).

And in these times of instant access to news, both accurate and bollocks, fickleness is taken to the extreme. Take a glance at many sites and comments from this week, and you’ll see Cesc and Arshavin ripped apart by ‘fans’ who worshipped them just days ago but now consider them ‘overrated’. The reason? Oh, that’ll be the Sun again, who suggested (subtly, as ever), that both wanted to both to Spain.

First Cesc explained his frustration at not winning trophies at Arsenal, but not in a ‘I want to leave’ way, but more like a genuine Arsenal fan, desperate for success. Of course the media world went bananas, but for a more rational view, check out Arseblogger’s post on the day the story broke, cutting through the crap with typical finesse.

And then this week, we have Arshavin, who wanted to move to Barcelona before he ever joined us, at a time when even joining Spurs was preferable to staying where he was, and on a very slow news day (after all, who wants to write about the Under 21s getting thumped by Germany last night?), the Sun decided to reprint his quote. Nothing like context to a story.

One consolation is that this idiocy isn’t restricted to football. I was at Wimbledon yesterday, sat in front of the big screen before Murray played another match on the road to being thumped by Federer in the final. The atmosphere was superb, and full of optimism, but ten minutes into the game, the plank behind me starting spouting more nonsense than I’ve heard down the pub in a long time. Here are some of his quotes, and bear in mind they were made after a whopping two games, with Murray 2-0 down in the first set.

“He’s bottled it, totally bottled it, it’ll be over in an hour”

“Write this set off, might as well just start playing the second now”

“Useless, I could’ve won that point, he’s not even a top 100 player really” [said after Murray had played a quite extraordinary shot that just missed]

“He’s getting hammered by an amateur!” [Wawrinka, his opponent, is in the top 20 in the world, and on yesterday's evidence, a damn good player]

“Scottish wanker, never liked him” [yeah, that's why you paid ticket money and are now sat on the hill, watching earnestly]

More and more, people around me were despairing. It was the equivalent of Villa coming to the Emirates, having a decent chance in the first minute, and the entire crowd writing our lot off as useless in the blink of an eye. It made absolutely no sense.

But then, very little does anymore. How does it make sense that the Sun has such a massive readership when their stories get more ridiculous by the day? How does it make sense that one voice of reason gets drowned out by twenty fools on Newsnow?

But fools are everywhere. Just look at the latest ramblings of the man in charge of our game. According to him, big spending=bad. But Real Madrid big spending=good, and Arsenal being frugal=bad.

Run that by me again, Sepp?

*sigh*

 

I often wonder how certain individuals get into the position they occupy in the world of football, be it coaches, managers, pundits or ‘expert’ columnists. Often the decisions they make and the words they produce are of such little value that it begs the question of why they are there in the first place. Surely, with the abundance of former players and fans out there, improvements can be made? No?

You have the likes of Steve Claridge on commentary, Paul Parker writing columns on Eurosport, Garth Crooks on the BBC – exactly what is the point of these people? Ever heard them come up with anything insightful, even accurate? And don’t even get me started on Mihir Bose, in his privileged position of BBC sports editor. Is there really no-one better?

But then you look up the food chain, to the boardrooms, and you begin to realise that idiocy filters all the way down from there. How else can you describe the decision to sack two Premiership managers a matter of days after the transfer window shut? Every year it happens, and never has it made sense.

Tony Adams was struggling at Portsmouth, no doubt, but he was forced to sell the likes of Defoe, Diarra, Mendes and Muntari, and was always up against it. Despite this, he seemed to be given time, and was even allowed to bring in a couple of players in January. Yet after just one more game, an admirable and fighting loss to Liverpool at that, he was gone.

Why? Thirteen league games is hardly enough to give him a fighting chance, but chairmen are quick to pull the trigger these days, so in a way that part is not a surprise. But if it was becoming clear that he wasn’t the right man, why wait until just after the transfer window shuts to act? Now the new manager must rescue the situation without the opportunity to make even slight changes, and there are players signed by Adams who a little over a week later are wondering whether they’ve made the right move.

Over to Chelsea, and the continuing saga of ‘who will replace Mourinho?’. The man himself must be chuckling privately to himself – since being sacked his stock has risen with every short reign at Stamford Bridge. Avram Grant was sacked after leading Chelsea to a massive unbeaten league run that almost won them the title, and reaching the Champions League final, and now Scolari has gone after barely unpacking his bags. And he didn’t even start on the back foot as Grant did.

Again though, the new man will have to make do with what he has, and not tap into Abramovich’s fortunes, as the window shut a week ago. They still have no fit wingers (unless you count Malouda, and I don’t, because he’s looking more useless with every passing week), Drogba still doesn’t want to play for them or with Anelka, and they are still an aging side. At least whoever comes in is guaranteed a healthy payoff before Christmas when he is inevitably dismissed.

Abramovich bought his way into the position of power he now occupies, which at least gives him the right to do as he pleases, and explains how someone who makes such strange decisions can be in charge. But the same is not true of the likes of Stan Collymore, who has been employed by the Mirror for a reason I’m yet to fathom. It certainly wasn’t for his intellect, unable to back up his ‘grave doubts’ that Arshavin would turn out to be any good. The irony of Collymore talking about someone failing to live up to their potential seemed to be lost on him.

Football is a world of fools. Would you have it any other way?

 

So, according to the FA, this incident will not result in Bosingwa facing censure:

 

Now imagine if Joey Barton had done it. Think the FA would have turned a blind eye?

And before you claim that the FA take past misdemeanours into account, they shouldn’t. Prior infractions affect only the punishment meted out, not whether the individual is charged in the first place or not.

What chance the Respect campaign working when the governing body are so woefully weak and inconsistent?

In other news, Arshavin is finally an Arsenal player. At long long long last.

 

I’ll talk about the match in full later, but first have to mention the absolutely appalling treatment dished out to Eboue today. Not by the opponents, or the opposing fans, but our very own ‘support’, those individuals who are supposed to get behind our players.

Eboue had a poor game by anyone’s standards, and a certain level of frustration is inevitable. That he was coming back from injury and playing out of position is part of the reason, but even taken that into consideration he will know that he can and should be doing much better.

But to boo him to the point of destroying his confidence, and then to compound that by cheering when he was taken off (as if substituting a substitute isn’t demoralising enough) is flat out disgraceful, and every ‘fan’ who did that should be utterly ashamed of themselves.

Fans are supposed to help their team, not hinder them and destroy their morale. What hope have we of seeing our team succeed when our very own fans give players a reason to leave the club? This is not an isolated incident, too many of our number are too quick to slip into a negative mindset.

I want to make it clear that this is not aimed at all fans. Most support the club through thick and thin, loyally defending our own and believing to the end. But to those plastic fickle fans who come along without the intention of giving the players the support they need, you might as well not turn up. There are plenty of fans ready to take your seat.

Eboue was very poor today, but his performance nowhere near plumbed the depths that certain members of the crowd sunk to. It was embarrassing, shameful, and beneath the standards of our great club.

© 2010 The Beautiful Groan Advertise on this site Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha